Review – Everything Everywhere All At Once



Synopsis A sad failing laundromat owner finds herself caught up in a multiversal conspiracy of cosmic proportions, and grapples with how someone like herself could be so important in saving the universe.

Length 2 Hours 12 Minutes

Release Date March 11, 2022 (Sundance), April 8, 2022 (Wide Release)


Rating R

Distribution A24

Directing Dan Kwan, Daniel Scheinert

Writing Dan Kwan, Daniel Scheinert

Composition Son Lux

Starring Michelle Yeoh, Ke Huy Quan, Stephanie Hsu, Jenny Slate, Harry Shum Jr., James Hong, Jamie Lee Curtis

Dan Kwan and Daniel Scheinert, colloquially known as “Daniels”, have earned themselves a unique position in modern filmmaking. They first came to prominence directing the music video for Turn Down For What, before working with A24 on their first film, Swiss Army Man (2016). Scheinert then went off on his own to direct the incredible dark comedy The Death of Dick Long (2019). Now they’re finally back together for their sophomore film together, Everything Everywhere All At Once (2022).

Content Guide

Violence/Scary Images: Limited gore but the film is an action movie with numerous scenes of blood and death. Often injuries are played for laughs.
Language/Crude Humor: Severe language throughout including f*** and s***.
Sexual Content: No sex or nudity is depicted on screen but sexuality is a frequent plot point. The main character’s daughter is in a lesbian relationship, and her coming out as gay to her grandfather is a major part of the narrative. There are also several action scenes where sex toys are used as weapons and a scene of a man going into a back room filled with sex toys.
Drug/Alcohol Use: Characters smoke and vape. There is alcohol consumption.
Spiritual Content: Religion plays no role in the story. The film’s philosophy is that life is ultimately meaningless and the only solution to despair and loneliness is human connection and kindness.
Other Negative Themes: Themes of suicide, despair, and meaninglessness.
Positive Content: Themes of kindness, connection, communication, love, and honesty.


To say that the Daniels have certain cinematic preoccupations would be an understatement. Swiss Army Man begins with a man about to commit suicide, before transitioning into an existentialist comedy about bonding with a farting corpse. Their films are silly, scatological, disgusting, nihilistic, and emotionally charged, brimming with absurd imagery and willing to use every moment of grotesque visual storytelling to drag the viewer along and force them to ponder the meaning of life.

And that’s all to say that Swiss Army Man was a promise, one of the best debut films of the past decade, and a hope that these two directors would reunite and grow as artists together. It appears with their second collaboration they’ve not only done so but knocked it out of the park with one of the most intense tour-de-force films in recent Hollywood history.

It’s easy to love a film like Everything Everywhere All At Once. It’s a film straight out of the Edgar Wright playbook—a genre mashup comedy filled with huge references to everything from Kung Fu movies to Terminator, The Matrix, Ratatouille, etc—but also a film that tries to marry it to Terrance Malick-esc emotional reflection on the nature of life, purpose, and ultimate meaning in the universe.

And since it is a Daniels production, it ultimately transforms into a film about the desire for self-annihilation within the endless meaninglessness of the universe, and the equal urge to force the universe to mean something when the urge to stare into the abyss is hanging over you. The result is a film that is, in some regards, emotionally juvenile, but cinematically impressive.

The film follows a small Chinese-American family struggling to get by in a failing laundromat. Evelyn Wang (Michelle Yeoh) is a mostly frustrated and unhappy middle-aged woman who is struggling with finances, struggling to reconcile her relationship with her estranged father, struggling in her marriage, and struggling to relate to her recently outed lesbian daughter.

During an average visit to the IRS to work out her tax problems, she’s confronted by a mysterious individual who possesses her husband and tells her that she is the key to saving the multiverse. She is given Bluetooth devices that allow her to trade minds with other Evelyns from other universes long enough to experience their lives and steal their abilities – kung fu fighting ability, cooking abilities, etc – that she can use to help survive a brutal supervillain who is hunting her down across the multiverse for some unclear reason.

There is a lot to recommend with Everything Everywhere All The Time. It is immensely funny, brutally emotional, goofy, action-packed, mind-altering, and thrilling. But what really sells it is its introspection. It’s a very small personal story—a story of a family of four struggling to overcome neglect and resentment—that is blown up into cosmic proportions. It’s a film where the utter vastness of the universe itself is a thematic stand-in for the emotional space created between characters who don’t know how to be honest with one another—people who just want to be told that it is okay for them to be the way they are.

It helps that the cast is an all-time great ensemble. Michelle Yeoh has completely broken out into the mainstream in the past decade in a surprising way, which is refreshing if you’ve known her long enough to remember her career-defining role in Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon. She’s a star in Star Trek: Discovery, The Mandalorian, The Book of Boba Fett, Crazy Rich Asians, and Shang-Chi, and she is set for roles in The Witcher Blood Origin and Avatar 2. And she gives one of her best performances to date for Everything Everywhere All the Time, playing a very vulnerable and sad role of a woman who is forced to reflect on a lifetime of mediocre choices and decisions and struggles to reconcile them.

The great James Hong and Jamie Lee Curtis are both on deck for major roles, turning in excellent funny performances for vital characters. The quiet MVP might very well be the surprising performance of Ke Huy Quan who is (I KID YOU NOT) best known for his performance as Short Round in Indiana Jones: Temple of Doom. The performance calls for him to play multiple roles simultaneously including a bumbling beta-male husband and a universe hopping conspiracy theorist scientist, and he has the range to make the role fully his, playing a vital part in the plot.

Certainly, much of the film is melodramatic. There is always a danger with wacky, emotionally heightened films such as this that the wackiness serves no purpose, that it’s all just channeling juvenile emotional stakes. And there is certainly some truth in that. The Daniels’ life philosophy seems to be that the universe and the structures of society are messy and meaningless; that there is no greater purpose to life and the only thing that holds together life itself are the small moments of kindness and connection between people, and it’s the only thing that makes life worth living.

Their viewpoint is a very atheistic vision of the universe and one the film posits, lending itself to despair and self-loathing. As the rapidly aging ethos of Rick and Morty has shown us, this sort of pop-nihilism has a short shelf life. Is “Wub A Lubba Dub Dub” still funny or fresh just eight years later? If Daniels really wanted to create a 2001 or Tree of Life for this particular moment of millennial existential angst, it is unclear how well it will age as our generation grows out of its youthful malaise and actually starts seeking meaningful adult ways to grasp the world.

The comparisons to 2001 or Tree of Life shouldn’t go unheeded though. Everything Everywhere All At Once is a miracle of a film; a personal story set against the cosmos that captures a humanist beauty in the desire for life to mean something and in the necessity to reject ultimate despair and suicide. This is the kind of fully realized cinematic masterpiece most directors only pull off once. It just so happens that it is also a movie with kung fu, heads exploding into confetti, evil IRS agents possessed by agents from another universe, a love story between two people with hotdogs instead of fingers, and a raccoon that controls a man’s hair that allows him to achieve his dream of becoming a hibachi chef.


+ Amazing editing and cinematography
+ Great comedy, action, and spectacle
+ Emotional personal story
+ Great performances
+ Fully realized story and execution


- Juvenile existential philosophy

The Bottom Line

Everything Everywhere All At Once is a masterpiece of comedy and spectacle and a beautiful movie about the meaning of life. Its musings may be somewhat adolescent, but as a realization of those ideas it is a masterpiece of visual storytelling and character writing!



Tyler Hummel

Tyler Hummel is a Nashville-based freelance journalist, a College Fix Fellow, and a member of the Music City Film Critics Association. He has contributed to Geeks Under Grace, The Living Church, North American Anglican, Baptist News Global, The Tennessee Register, Angelus News, The Dispatch, Voeglin View, Hollywood in Toto, Law and Liberty, The Federalist, Main Street Nashville, Leaders Media, and the Catholic Herald of Milwaukee.


  1. Anna on March 15, 2023 at 11:41 am

    This is an anti Catholic movie

  2. Jason G. on May 21, 2022 at 1:30 pm

    This is a good and revealing review, although I wonder if the take on existential philosophy as juvenile may be related to the author’s personal spiritual beliefs or educational experience (i.e., perhaps learning about existentialism in high school or college made him believe that existentialism is most suited to people of those ages). A viewer whose philosophy doesn’t begin and end with an anthropomorphized divine being might not believe that growing up means embracing more “meaningful adult ways to grasp the world.” Some people experience growing up in quite another way, such that–for us–growing up means questioning and ultimately discarding the religious identities and beliefs of our youth. I don’t mean that to sound any more condescending than dismissing existentialism as juvenile should sound, to be clear. Meanwhile, if ever there were a time for a movie about the apparent meaninglessness of the world around us and the importance of human connection as a way of finding and creating meaning in the midst of that, this is surely it–the party that was dominated by the Religious Right for decades is morphing into a fascistic insurgency that overturns democratic practices in favor of securing and consolidating political power. All of this in a supposedly free country.

    Aside from the critique of this review, I think it’s important to point out one error: Michelle Yeoh is absolutely amazing, but she is not in The Mandalorian or The Book of Boba Fett. Ming-Na Wen plays Fennec Shand in those. I was surprised to learn that they were born about a year apart! They are both astounding actors and have aged more gracefully than I suppose I will have done by the time I’m their age!

    • Michael on July 30, 2022 at 9:26 pm

      The image of God is not always expressed through anthropomorphism in the Christian Bible. A Christian with a more fully developed theology understand that God the Father is both invisible and transcendent, despite the Bible using a lot of anthropomorphic imagery to help its readers to better grasp aspects of God’s nature. And sure, Christ’s incarnation was in a human form, and yes, we are made in God’s image, but that isn’t restricted to mere physical characteristics. The notion of God being like an old man with a beard living on a cloud within our own time and space most certainly exists within the realms of “juvenile philosophy”.

      • Jason G. on July 31, 2022 at 9:23 am

        Fair response–in retrospect, I was flippant to talk about Christian faith as believing in an anthropomorphized deity–I see how that comes off as insulting, and I apologize for that–although I do think the nature of the Trinity and the hypostatic union means that there’s a greater connection between God and man than your response may perhaps acknowledge. But that wasn’t really my point; I just found your dismissal of existentialism to be itself insufficient. I do think Christians writ large in this country (I’m assuming this is an American blog) aren’t grappling with a lot of complexities that something like existentialism might help them get a better hold on. Even if a more agnostic existentialism could act as a bridge and help them acknowledge that there are ethical demands that they are gliding over when they make large decisions that change the lives of other people, that would be a welcome change in my mind. And for a juvenile philosophy, existentialism seemed to work for theistic philosophers like Kierkegaard and Buber. I do not find them or their musings adolescent in any way.

Leave a Comment